Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositoriobiologico.com.br//jspui/handle/123456789/653
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Mariana Assunção de -
dc.contributor.authorBombonato, Nadia Grandi -
dc.contributor.authorSoares, Pollyanna Mafra -
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Gabriela Bim -
dc.contributor.authorCastro, Igor Paula -
dc.contributor.authorMedeiros, Alessandra Aparecida -
dc.contributor.authorLima, Anna Monteiro Correia -
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-16T19:13:42Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-16T19:13:42Z-
dc.date.issued2016-12-15-
dc.identifier.citationSouza, Mariana Assunção de; Bombonato, Nadia Grandi; Soares, Pollyanna Mafra, Ramos, Gabriela Bim; Castro, Igor Paula; Medeiros, Alessandra Aparecida; Lima, Anna Monteiro Correia. Comparison of complementary diagnostic methods of bovine tuberculosis on skin-test reactive cattle. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico, v. 83, e0592014, 2016.pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1808-1657pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositoriobiologico.com.br//jspui/handle/123456789/653-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare different complementary diagnostic methods (macroscopic, histological, serological and molecular) of tuberculosis in naturally infected cattle. The study was conducted from samples taken from 40 reagents cattle in cervical comparative intradermal tuberculin test (ITT). The macroscopic post mortem inspection of carcasses was followed by the collection of nasal swabs, blood and tissue samples (liver, lung and mediastinal lymph node) for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and histopathologic test with hematoxylin-eosin (HE) and Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN), respectively. Of the 40 cattle slaughtered, 22 (55%) carcasses had macroscopic lesions suggestive of tuberculosis. The histopathology HE identified 13 (32.5%) carcasses with histological changes: 6 (15%) in the mediastinal lymph nodes, 5 (12.5%) in the liver and 3 (7.5%) in the lung. At ZN, the presence of acid-fast bacilli was not detected in any of the samples tested. The ELISA/IDEXX(r) identified one (2.5%) reagent animal, and the PCR test detected DNA of Mycobacterium bovis in one (2.5%) cow. It is concluded that among the diagnostic methods reviews none was able to detect all animals that were positive in tuberculin test, but the association of different methods can ensure diagnostic accuracy.pt_BR
dc.language.isoen_USpt_BR
dc.subjectAcid-fast bacillipt_BR
dc.subjectELISA, Mycobacterium bovispt_BR
dc.subjectPolymerase chain reactionpt_BR
dc.subjectHistopathologypt_BR
dc.titleComparison of complementary diagnostic methods of bovine tuberculosis on skin-test reactive cattlept_BR
dc.title.alternativeExames complementares no diagnóstico da tuberculose em bovinos reagentes à tuberculinização comparadapt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1808-1657000592014 pt_BR
dc.description.editoraInstituto Biológicopt_BR
dc.description.localdapublicacaoSão Paulopt_BR
dc.identifier.tipoAbertopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Exames complementares no 83.pdf734.29 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.